An Institutional Review Board (IRB) and a Research Ethics Committee (REC) are two different types of bodies that are responsible for ensuring that research involving human subjects is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. While the terms are often used interchangeably, there are some differences between an IRB and a REC.
In the United States, an IRB is a committee that is established by an institution, such as a university or hospital, to review and approve research protocols that involve human subjects. The IRB is responsible for ensuring that the study is designed and conducted in an ethical manner, that the risks to participants are minimized, and that the potential benefits of the study outweigh any potential harms. The IRB also monitors ongoing studies to ensure that they continue to meet ethical and safety standards.
In other countries, such as the United Kingdom, a Research Ethics Committee (REC) may have a similar role to an IRB. RECs are independent committees that review research proposals to ensure that they meet ethical and legal requirements, and that they are designed in a way that respects the rights and welfare of human participants. RECs may also provide ongoing monitoring and review of ongoing studies.
While there are some differences in the way that IRBs and RECs are structured and operate, their overall purpose is the same: to ensure that research involving human subjects is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. Both IRBs and RECs may require researchers to submit detailed study protocols and obtain informed consent from study participants, and both may monitor ongoing studies to ensure that they continue to meet ethical and safety standards.
Share this story...
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – NICE Real World Evidence Framework
RWE 101 - NICE Real World Evidence Framework The UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has developed a Real World Evidence (RWE) Framework to help evaluate [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Role of RWE in Health Technology Assessments (HTAs)
RWE 101 - The Role of RWE in Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) Real-world evidence (RWE) is becoming increasingly important in the context of health technology assessment (HTA), which is [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Verifying the Source of Data (Not to be Confused with Source Data Verification…Yup! Confusing!)
RWE 101 - Verifying the Source of Data (Not to be Confused with Source Data Verification...Yup! Confusing!) Verifying the source of data is critical in the context of real [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Challenges in RWE Generation (Regulatory Grade RWE?)
RWE 101 - Challenges in RWE Generation (Regulatory Grade RWE?) Real-world evidence (RWE) refers to data derived from real-world sources such as electronic health records, claims data, and patient-generated [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Challenges Pharma Companies Face when Using RWE to Support Marketing Authorisations
RWE 101 - Challenges Pharma Companies Face when Using RWE to Support Marketing Authorisations Real-world evidence (RWE) studies include observational studies that uses data collected in real-world settings to [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Acknowledgement of the Limitations of Clinical Trials and RWE Studies
RWE 101 - Acknowledgement of the Limitations of Clinical Trials and RWE Studies Clinical trials are experiments designed to test the safety and efficacy of new treatments or [...]







