Real-world evidence (RWE) has become an increasingly important source of data for regulatory decision-making in healthcare. The evolution of RWE regulations can be traced back to the late 1990s, when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began to encourage the use of observational studies, such as registries and natural history studies, to supplement clinical trial data in the evaluation of medical products.
In 2011, the FDA launched the Sentinel Initiative, a program that uses electronic health records and other healthcare data sources to monitor the safety of medical products in real time. This initiative paved the way for the use of RWE in regulatory decision-making, and led to the development of guidelines and frameworks for the use of RWE in drug development and regulatory decision-making.
In 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law in the US, which included provisions to support the use of RWE in regulatory decision-making. The Act directed the FDA to establish a program to evaluate the potential use of RWE to support drug approvals, and to issue guidance on the use of RWE in regulatory decision-making.
In 2018, the FDA issued its first guidance on the use of RWE to support drug approvals, which outlined the types of RWE that could be used, the study designs that could be employed, and the factors that would be considered in the evaluation of RWE. The guidance also emphasized the importance of ensuring the quality and reliability of RWE, and the need for transparent reporting and validation of RWE studies.
Since then, regulatory agencies around the world have continued to develop guidelines and frameworks for the use of RWE in regulatory decision-making. For example, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has established a framework for the use of RWE in the evaluation of medicines, which includes the use of RWE to support marketing authorizations and post-authorization safety monitoring.
Overall, the evolution of RWE regulations reflects the growing recognition of the value of real-world data in healthcare decision-making, and the need for guidelines and frameworks to ensure the quality and reliability of RWE studies.
Share this story...
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Is ICH GCP Applicable to Non-Interventional Studies?
RWE 101 - Is ICH GCP Applicable to Non-Interventional Studies? No, the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines are not applicable to non-interventional studies [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Ethical Principles and Safeguards for Medical AI in the Context of Real World Evidence
RWE 101 - Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 - Ethical Principles and Safeguards for Medical AI in the Context of Real World Evidence Medical AI applications hold [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Declaration of Helsinki
RWE 101 - The Declaration of Helsinki The Declaration of Helsinki is a set of ethical principles that govern the conduct of medical research involving human subjects. [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Ethical Foundation of RWE Research
RWE 101 - Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 - Ethical Foundation of RWE Research Real-world evidence (RWE) research, which is the study of data from real-world settings, is [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Impact of GDPR on RWE Research
RWE 101 - Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 - The Impact of GDPR on RWE Research The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a regulation in EU [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – De-Identification versus Pseudo-Anonymisation
RWE 101 - Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 - De-Identification versus Pseudo-Anonymisation De-identification and pseudo-anonymization are two commonly used techniques for protecting personal information in real world [...]







