The Declaration of Helsinki is a set of ethical principles that govern the conduct of medical research involving human subjects. It was first adopted in 1964 and has been revised several times since then, most recently in 2013.
In the context of real-world evidence (RWE), the Declaration of Helsinki is particularly relevant because RWE often involves the collection and analysis of data from sources that were not originally intended for research purposes, such as electronic health records or claims data. This raises important ethical considerations, such as privacy and confidentiality concerns, and the need to obtain informed consent from study participants.
The Declaration of Helsinki provides guidance on these and other ethical issues related to medical research involving human subjects. For example, it states that research involving human subjects must be conducted in accordance with ethical principles, including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. It also emphasizes the importance of obtaining informed consent from study participants, protecting their privacy and confidentiality, ensuring that the risks and benefits of the research are appropriately balanced, and ensuring research transparency by publishing the results (both positive and negative).
In the context of RWE, these ethical principles can help guide the development and implementation of research studies that use real-world data. For example, researchers can use the Declaration of Helsinki as a framework for designing studies that protect the privacy and confidentiality of study participants, obtain informed consent, and balance the risks and benefits of the research.
Overall, the Declaration of Helsinki provides important ethical guidance for medical research involving human subjects, including research that uses real-world data. Adhering to these principles can help ensure that RWE studies are conducted in an ethical and responsible manner.
Share this story...
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – HIPAA
RWE 101 - HIPAA HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), enacted in 1996, is a federal law in the United States that establishes regulations for the protection of [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Common Rule
RWE 101 - The Common Rule The Common Rule plays a significant role in the governance of observational studies. The Common Rule refers to a set of regulations and [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (the reason we have the Belmont Report and the Common Rule)
RWE 101 - The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (the reason we have the Belmont Report and the Common Rule) The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, conducted from 1932 to 1972, stands as [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Observational Study vs Non-Interventional Study
RWE 101 - Observational Study vs Non-Interventional Study In the context of real-world evidence (RWE), the terms "observational study" and "non-interventional study" are often used interchangeably to refer to [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Are Non-Interventional Studies Regulated?
RWE 101 - Are Non-Interventional Studies Regulated? Yes, non-interventional studies (NIS) are regulated. While the specific regulations and requirements may vary by country, there are generally guidelines and provisions [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Postmarket Requirements (PMR) vs Post-Authorisation Safety Studies (PASS)
RWE 101 - Postmarket Requirements (PMR) vs Post-Authorisation Safety Studies (PASS) In the context of real-world evidence (RWE) and regulatory frameworks, postmarket requirements (PMRs) and post-authorization safety studies (PASS) [...]







