Digital health refers to the use of digital technologies, such as mobile devices, wearables, and health apps, to improve healthcare delivery, patient outcomes, and population health. Real-world evidence (RWE), on the other hand, refers to data generated from real-world settings, including electronic health records, claims data, patient-generated data, and data from wearable devices, among others.
In the context of digital health, RWE plays a crucial role in demonstrating the value and effectiveness of digital health interventions. For instance, RWE can be used to evaluate the impact of a mobile health app on patient outcomes, such as improved medication adherence or reduced hospital readmissions. RWE can also be used to identify patient populations that may benefit the most from digital health interventions, as well as to assess the feasibility and scalability of such interventions in real-world settings.
Furthermore, RWE can inform regulatory decision-making around digital health products, such as the approval and reimbursement of digital health interventions. For example, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established a framework for the use of RWE in regulatory decision-making, which includes the use of RWE to support the approval of digital health products.
Overall, digital health and RWE are closely intertwined, with RWE serving as a key component in the development, evaluation, and implementation of digital health interventions.
Share this story...
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – HIPAA
RWE 101 - HIPAA HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), enacted in 1996, is a federal law in the United States that establishes regulations for the protection of [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Common Rule
RWE 101 - The Common Rule The Common Rule plays a significant role in the governance of observational studies. The Common Rule refers to a set of regulations and [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (the reason we have the Belmont Report and the Common Rule)
RWE 101 - The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (the reason we have the Belmont Report and the Common Rule) The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, conducted from 1932 to 1972, stands as [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Observational Study vs Non-Interventional Study
RWE 101 - Observational Study vs Non-Interventional Study In the context of real-world evidence (RWE), the terms "observational study" and "non-interventional study" are often used interchangeably to refer to [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Are Non-Interventional Studies Regulated?
RWE 101 - Are Non-Interventional Studies Regulated? Yes, non-interventional studies (NIS) are regulated. While the specific regulations and requirements may vary by country, there are generally guidelines and provisions [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Postmarket Requirements (PMR) vs Post-Authorisation Safety Studies (PASS)
RWE 101 - Postmarket Requirements (PMR) vs Post-Authorisation Safety Studies (PASS) In the context of real-world evidence (RWE) and regulatory frameworks, postmarket requirements (PMRs) and post-authorization safety studies (PASS) [...]







