Electronic consent or eConsent refers to the process of using electronic systems and processes to convey information related to the study and to obtain and document participant consent. While eConsent brings numerous benefits to the table, such as improved participant comprehension, streamlined workflows, and easier tracking and managing of consent versions, it is not universally accepted in Real-World Evidence (RWE) studies due to several reasons:
[1] Regulatory Variations: Regulatory guidelines and requirements vary across different jurisdictions and countries. Some regions may not yet have clear guidance or regulations that specifically endorse eConsent, causing uncertainty about its legal validity.
[2] Digital Divide: While digital technologies are pervasive (increasingly accepted), access to and familiarity with these technologies is not universal. Some potential study participants may lack the technology needed for eConsent or may not be comfortable using it, which could potentially exclude certain populations from participation (introducing bias).
[3] Data Security and Privacy Concerns: As with any digital system, there are concerns related to data security and privacy. Participants may worry about their personal information being mishandled or leaked, especially given the sensitivity of health data.
[4] Implementation Costs: Setting up a secure, user-friendly eConsent system that can also meet all regulatory requirements is a significant investment. Small research entities or those in low-resource settings might find it challenging to bear these costs.
[5] Technical Hurdles: eConsent systems require a level of technical infrastructure and support to function effectively. This can include the need for reliable internet connectivity, ongoing technical support, regular software updates, and more.
Despite these challenges, the adoption of eConsent is increasing due to the evolution of technology, better regulatory support, and the COVID-19 pandemic necessitating remote study processes. As these challenges are addressed over time, it’s expected that eConsent will become a more universally accepted practice in RWE studies.
Share this story...
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – ‘Interventional’ Clinical Trial vs Non-Interventional Study
RWE 101 - 'Interventional' Clinical Trial vs Non-Interventional Study Interventional Clinical Trial: In this type of study, researchers actively intervene by assigning participants to different groups, administering specific treatments, [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Are the terms ‘clinical study’ and ‘clinical trial’ synonymous in the context of non-interventional studies?
RWE 101 - Are the terms 'clinical study' and 'clinical trial' synonymous in the context of non-interventional studies? No, "clinical study" and "clinical trial" are not necessarily synonymous in [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Importance of Regulatory Definitions
RWE 101 - The Importance of Regulatory Definitions "Words are powerful"Regulatory definitions are important in the context of real-world evidence (RWE) studies and real-world research for several reasons:[1] Consistency: [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Regulatory Compliance
RWE 101 - Regulatory Compliance Regulatory compliance in the context of real-world evidence (RWE) refers to ensuring that the generation and use of RWE for regulatory purposes [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Regulatory Intelligence
RWE 101 - Regulatory Intelligence In the context of real-world evidence (RWE) and real-world research (RWR), regulatory intelligence refers to the process of gathering, analyzing, and interpreting regulatory information [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Regulatory Science
RWE 101 - Regulatory Science Regulatory science is a field of study that involves the application of scientific methods, principles, and data to the development and evaluation of regulatory [...]







