Closing a non-interventional (observational) study involves several key activities to ensure the study is concluded ethically (and respectfully), the data is handled appropriately, and findings are disseminated (shared) effectively. These activities can be grouped into several categories:
- Data Management and Analysis: Ensure all data collection is complete, including any follow-up information. Check the data for accuracy, completeness, and consistency. Perform the final analyses as per the statistical analysis plan. Once the data analysis is complete and verified, the database should be locked to prevent any further changes.
- Ethical and Regulatory Compliance: Inform the ethics committee(s) (and competent authorities where applicable) about the study’s completion according to national reporting requirements and timelines.
- Documentation and Reporting: Prepare a report that includes the study objectives, methodology, results, safety data and conclusions. Plan for the publication of study findings through scientific articles, conference presentations, and reports to stakeholders (participants, patient advocacy groups, etc.). Notify the relevant public databases (e.g., clinicaltrials.gov) that they study has closed and provide a summary of the results and/or links to publications.
- Study Close-out Visit (if applicable): For studies with physical sites, if needed, conduct close-out visits to ensure all study-related materials are accounted for (e.g., unused data collection tools) and to debrief site staff. One of the (many) benefits of observational studies is there is no drug…and therefore no need for drug reconciliation.
- Participant Communication: Notify participants (patients) about the study’s completion, thank them for their involvement and share the results with them.
- Financial and Contractual Closure: Ensure all financial matters related to the study, such as payments to vendors or sites, are settled. Review and close any contracts related to the study, ensuring all obligations have been met.
Each of these activities requires careful planning and execution to ensure the study is closed responsibly and efficiently. The specifics may vary based on the study’s design, the national regulatory requirements.
Share this story...
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – France – CNIL Regulatory Sandbox: Digital Health
RWE 201 - France – CNIL Regulatory Sandbox: Digital Health The French Data Protection Agency (CNIL) has been actively supporting digital health technology innovators through its regulatory "sandbox." These [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – France – CNIL Reference Methodologies: Facilitating Access to Real World Data
RWE 201 - France – CNIL Reference Methodologies: Facilitating Access to Real World Data The CNIL (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés) is the French [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – France – Health Data Hub: Facilitating Access to Real World Data
RWE 201 - France – Health Data Hub: Facilitating Access to Real World Data The purpose of France's Health Data Hub (HDH) is to facilitate the [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – Canada – Health Canada’s position on the CADTH Guidance for Reporting RWE to Support Decision-making
RWE 201 - Canada – Health Canada’s position on the CADTH Guidance for Reporting RWE to Support Decision-making Health Canada released its position (May 2023) on [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – Canada – Methods and Guidelines for Reporting Real World Evidence
RWE 201 - Canada – Methods and Guidelines for Reporting Real World Evidence Guidance for Reporting Real-World Evidence (RWE) [published May 2023] is a comprehensive document developed by the [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – Health Canada’s 15 Key Elements for Protocol Development
RWE 201 - Health Canada's 15 Key Elements for Protocol Development Health Canada acknowledges that RWE can be particularly useful in areas where conducting controlled clinical trials is challenging [...]







