Let’s start by assuming that you have done your homework, which means:
- You’ve classified your study in each region e.g., non-interventional study
- You’ve identified the relevant national regulations and guidelines
Now what?
Now you need to consider whether there are any other conditions that are applicable to your study. For example:
[1] Has the study been imposed by a regulatory authority as a condition of the marketing authorisation? Is it a postmarket requirement (PMR = USA) or a post-authorisation safety study (PASS = EU)?
[2] Are there any study-specific research procedures? If so, will this impact the study classification and/or the ability conduct the study in the country of interest? Examples include the inability to take study-specific biosamples in Germany in the context of a (drug) non-interventional study.
[3] Are there any considerations specific to the patient population e.g., minors, minors who may progress to adulthood during the study term, legally incapacitated adults?
The answers to these questions allow you to start building the regulatory assumptions that form the basis of the regulatory roadmap for your study. In this instance, our study is a prospective post-authorisation safety study of a new treatment (Drug X) for prostate cancer in adults that has been imposed as a condition of the marketing authorisation by the EMA. Based on this information we would build our regulatory assumptions like this…
Regulatory Assumptions
– Non-interventional post-authorisation safety study (PASS)
– Imposed PASS (Category 1)
– PRAC endorsement of protocol required
– EMA PASS protocol and report templates must be used
– Registration on the EU PAS register is mandatory
– Prospective data collection
– Retrospective data collection = Medical history
– Expedited safety reporting (as per GVP Module VI)
– Study conduct and scientific considerations (as per GVP Module VIII)
– Compliance with national regulatory requirements for non-interventional studies required
– Drug X is approved and prescribed in the study country
– Patients are adults (18 years and over)
– Study-specific biosamples required for genetic screening via a central lab (excludes Germany unless the study is conducted as a low-intervention clinical trial there)
These regulatory assumptions provide the foundation for creating a study-specific regulatory playbook and roadmap covering the national approvals, notifications, and study conduct considerations.
Regulatory assumptions are important. They detail, in simple language, the key elements of the study that drive the regulatory requirements and operational considerations. Small changes to these regulatory assumptions can have a big impact on the study in terms of time, cost and feasibility.
Remember…small changes can have a big impact!
Share this story...
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – Beyond Clinical Trials: Health Canada’s Commitment to Real World Evidence
RWE 201 - Beyond Clinical Trials: Health Canada's Commitment to Real World Evidence Health Canada is dedicated to enhancing drug accessibility, affordability, and correct usage within the country. To [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – A Tale of Two Regulatory Paths: Non-Interventional Studies in the USA
RWE 201 - A Tale of Two Regulatory Paths: Non-Interventional Studies in the USA Non-interventional studies are different from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Instead of actively intervening in a [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – FDA’s Advancing RWE Program
RWE 201 - FDA's Advancing RWE Program Real-world evidence is transforming the regulatory landscape, enabling the FDA to make informed decisions based on robust data from real-world settings. [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – FDA’s RWE Considerations Draft Guidance
RWE 201 - FDA's RWE Considerations Draft Guidance The 21st Century Cures Act, signed into law in 2016, mandated the FDA to establish a framework for the evaluation of [...]
Real World Evidence 201 – FDAs RWE Framework
RWE 201 - FDAs RWE Framework Real World Evidence (RWE) 201 – FDAs RWE Framework RWE 201: https://rwr-regs.com/rwe-201/ The FDA's Real-World Evidence (RWE) Program framework, established under the [...]
Real World Evidence 201 – The 21st Century Cures Act
RWE 201 - The 21st Century Cures Act The 21st Century Cures Act (CURES 1.0), signed into law in the U.S. in December 2016, aimed to accelerate [...]







